Analyze each of the 2 articles independently utilizing the below guidelines for

Analyze each of the 2 articles independently utilizing the below guidelines for research critiques.
– List 5 Discussion questions for each article in a separate section from the research critique
Content Requirements
Your critiques should address the following main points:
1. A brief summary of the article. This is your summary of the article, not the abstract for the article or a summary from another source.
2. A description of at least one clear strength and one clear weakness of the introduction. For this section, you should determine whether the authors provide support for the primary hypotheses in the paper. In other words, do the authors provide a focused explanation for their hypotheses? You should also address whether the hypotheses are reasonable and whether the authors describe the implications of their hypotheses.
3. A description of at least one clear strength and one clear weakness of the method section. This section should include a critique of the sample characteristics and recruitment, the procedures/design for the study, and the measures/materials used. For example, does the sample seem representative of the population of interest? Did the authors operationalize the variables of interest appropriately? Do the measures/materials fit the operational definitions of the variables of interest?
4. A description of at least one clear strength and one clear weakness of the results section. This section should include consideration of both the descriptive and inferential statistics presented, as well as the use of figures and tables. For the first research critique, this section can focus on the presentation of data and whether the analyses seem to fit the hypotheses, as we will not have covered many statistics topics at this point in the course. For the second research critique, you should also include whether the analyses were appropriate for the study or other analyses should have been considered.
5. A description of at least one clear strength and one clear weakness of the discussion. The authors’ interpretation of their results should be assessed in this section. Specifically, do the authors’ interpretations seem reasonable given the methods and results in the study? In addition, you should discuss the limitations of the study that the authors include in the discussion, if any are included.